Bio-TechnologyFuture Physical | home

BIO-TECH Home
BIO-TECH
Home

BIO-TECH Timeline
BIO-TECH
Timeline

BioTechnology Home
BioTechnology
Home

BioTechnology Forum
BioTechnology
Forum

BIO-TECH  Documentation
BIO-TECH
Documentation

BIO-TECH INTERCHANGE - DOCUMENTATION
Sunday 16th - Wednesday 19th February 2003


SUNDAY 16TH FEBRUARY 2003


20.00 | KEYNOTE SPEECH - SARA DIAMOND (CANADA)

Click here to access the archived stream of this speech

Cornfield and Flatford rooms

Keynote speech by visionary artist Sarah Diamond (Artistic Director, Media Visual Arts, The Banff Centre, Canada) on her concepts for the future merging of biology and technology.


THE MARRIAGE BETWEEN BIOLOGY & TECHNOLOGY

Process based notes reported live during her talk which document the key issues, thoughts, ideas and questions raised by Sara Diamond in her talk on the marriage between biology and technology.

Ancient myths
Human society/non living forms - taking on animal identities

MISANTHROPY - truth telling and magic.
RESEARCH
ETHICS
SHAPE SHIFTING - animal form - ROLE PLAY
INVISIBLE SPIRT
EROTIC ENCOUNTER

BEAUTY AND THE BEAST
Codes and rituals
Systems of beauty - meaning and effect
Desire and disgust
GAME PLAY
INTERIOR SPACES OF THE BODY
EROTIC FANTASY
STORY TELLING
THE BEAST WITHIN

THE RETURN OF BEAUTY IN A POSTMODERN WORLD
Archaic values of beauty in scientific world
PHENOMENA
ALLEGORY

BEAUTY = THREE THINGS:

INTEGRATION
CLARITY
HARMONY

WHOLENESS
HARMONY
RADIANCE

The construction of beauty:

IMPORTANCE OF AESTHETICS = artistic

Form is essential to beauty not content
COMMUNICABILITY
UNIVERSAL TRUTH
CULTURAL SPECIFITY
COMPLEX SYSTEMS - KANTS IDEAS RELEVANT - PURPOSENESS

COMMON CONGITION - shared statements of beauty

Hegel: OBJECTIVE - qualitative view. There is something objective about beauty.

OBJECTIVE/SUBJECT

ROLE PLAY/FANTASY - key to transformation

CHAOS THEORY - diversity and beauty linked to

Culture of the Goddess -

Interpretation of beauty and beast

CONSUMPTION

BREEDER

FEMALE EROTIC POWER/ANIMAL STATE

SEDUCTION

TRANSGENICS

Darwin - EVOLUTION & SYMMETRY

BOUNDARIES OF BEAUTY

GLOBALISATION

Complexity and asymmetry as organising principles
Incomplete - makes things interesting

SOCIAL VALUES AND CONSENSUS

NEW FORMS OF PLEASURE - embrace beauty and disgust

State changes/system

COOPERATIVE/COMPETITIVE SYSTEMS

AESTHETIC CONDITIONS OF INVENTION

NOTION OF BEAUTY EQUILIBRIUM - the universal nature

Beauty is a relation - in the comparison that we make - similarity/difference

Fashion and taste culture

Misaim/Zebra - function as social group, change form/camouflage - most advanced form

RESOURCE ACCESS for artists difficult
ARTISTIC PLAY - unwelcome in science

Web research -
CLONING AND GENOMICS
IMMUNOLOGY, GM
TRANSGENTICS
NANOTECHNOLOGY - carbon versus silicon and smart materials

ART WAS ON THE EDGE - artists no longer claiming that role, science is.

BIOTERROISM - age of passivity

ARE WE BEYOND THE IMAGE? Non visual space

Beautiful panic culture of today. ANXIETY
Research ethics

Structure of knowledge -

Art is about METHODOLOGY - immersion in making/critique of making

Does life matter and for whom?

Deprivation, control and command

Think twice - Kirin beer - Cow antibodies with human antibodies -cloning - replacement of human parts within cows. Cats being cloned. Animals as clones of ourselves. Cows as a container - never about cow. Think inside the CLONE - being within that subject position.

Feminist analysis of beauty > cows as holding tanks >domestic space
Spaces for artists in this work: between social and mythological.

PARTICIPANT QUESTIONS

Are we beyond the image -?
Role of design versus role of art. Designer takes role of user.

When things are hot they are not red - they are white or blue

Artists construct metaphors - problems of science in representation. Move away from realism into abstraction.

Problem with astrophysics - graphical representation of a star - use of colour to demonstrate - issue of communication in user and limits of their understanding. Interesting gap in terms of colour theory. Language needs to shift to enable popular understanding, in this case wrong as red is not associated with hot.

Troubled by ideas of beauty - object as having intrinsic beauty. Beauty only works if believe in beast - moral scale and artistic work. Theory does not work for cultural audiences.

RETURN TO BEAUTY AND AESTHETIC the organic and anti organic.

Beauty and purposefulness. Difference between sublime and beauty and purposelessness of sublime. No shared language between arts and scientists. Scientists use beauty in a very uncomplex way, the idea of anti aesthetic is not understood. Culture clash. What is important is that artists are not trying to make beautiful work unlike data visualisation designers who are searching for beauty.

Form important in crossover culture/collaborative practice.

CULTURAL CONTEXT - Animal - nature and animal activism in UK - relationship very powerful.

Think about subject position

documentation - feb 2003 >>

DOCUMENTATION INDEX
BIOTECH DOCUMENTATION PROCESS

16/02 BIOTECH INTRODUCTIONS
16/02 GROUP DISCUSSIONS
IDENTITY - GP 1
IDENTITY - GP 2
IDENTITY - GP 3
IDENTITY - GP 4
IDENTITY - GP 5
16/02 KEYNOTE SPEECH
SARA DIAMOND

17/02 GENERAL DISCUSSION AM
17/02 GENERAL DISCUSSION PM
17/02 GROUP DISCUSSION EVE

18/02 GENERAL DISCUSSION AM
18/02 GENERAL DISCUSSION PM
18/02 Q&A'S ABOUT 'OUR' BODIES
18/02 BIOFLOWS

19/02 BIOTECH SUMMARY NOTES
19/02 BIOTECH PUBLIC
DISCUSSION FORUM

related links >>

Participant List

BIOTECH Picture Gallery

Pictures of BIOTECH Participants

BIOTECH Webcasts

Code Zebra - Co-Production

Bioflows

Cluster 2003